Topic summary
48%1 analyzed article/video283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tennessee Elections results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 839 faulty-reasoning hits from 849 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 76% (4,074 of 16,562 topics). This Tennessee Elections is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Tennessee Elections
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Tennessee Elections attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Tennessee Elections vs sitewide
Tennessee Elections attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.