WPLN News12%

Tennessee banned AI in political ads. Why candidates are using it anyway 37%

By Marianna Bacallao11%

7/24/2026, 9:28:22 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 501 faulty-reasoning hits from 283 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,948 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the article peer group.

This year, Tennessee banned political campaigns from using artificial intelligence in their ads without some sort of disclosure. 
Two Republican frontrunners in the race for the 6th Congressional District have used AI to attack the other, but there’s a chance neither will face consequences for violating the new law. 
In an ad for Hilleary, an AI-generated version of Garrett is seen shaking hands with drag queens, laughing with Nancy Pelosi and standing in front of a whiteboard that reads, “Systemic racism is real.” 
“Woke, DEI-loving Johnny Garrett wants to transition Tennessee from conservative to woke,” the ad’s voiceover said. 
The ad intentionally misrepresents Garrett, who has campaigned against DEI and LGBTQ rights. 
Garrett also uses AI in his ad, depicting Hilleary driving a campaign bus into a swamp. 
“Hilleary says he wants to help President Trump drain the swamp. 
Don’t be fooled. 
Send Van packing,” the voiceover said. 
Garrett’s ad never shows Hilleary’s face beyond detailing on the bus, achieving the same effect as having an actor impersonate him. 
Enforcement of the law, in this case, is not up to Tennessee’s Bureau of Ethics and Campaign Finance, a spokesperson told WPLN News. 
For there to be an investigation, a voter either has to complain to a local district attorney or one of the candidates has to sue the other in civil court. 
So far, there’s been no record of a complaint filed in the 6th Congressional District. 
Hilleary and Garrett’s campaigns did not respond to WPLN’s request for comment on whether they would pursue legal action against the other. 
Early voting runs through Aug. 
1. 
Primary election day is Aug. 
6. 
Confirmation Bias
4.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
17.3%
Representativeness Heuristic
7.4%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
2.1%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
0%
Pessimism Bias
12%
Negativity Bias
18.7%
Self-Serving Bias
0%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
5.7%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
0%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
0%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
10.6%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
16.3%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
24.7%
Begging the Question
4.6%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
1.1%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
7.4%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
12.7%
Quote-first Misdirection
12%
Biased Writer Voice
16.6%
Indoctrination
3.2%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%

283 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.