Topic summary
ā 78%1 analyzed article/video433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Technological Advancements results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 331 hits. Analysis detected 1,336 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ā 74% (6,598 of 24,545 topics). This Technological Advancements is worse (more manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Technological Advancements
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,732
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.1% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 11.0%11.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos