Author summary
75%1 analyzed article/video663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Whowhatwhy Editors results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 400 hits. Analysis detected 1,664 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,989 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,540 of 6,595 authors). This Whowhatwhy Editors is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Whowhatwhy Editors
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Whowhatwhy Editors attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Whowhatwhy Editors vs sitewide
Whowhatwhy Editors attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.