Topic summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video165 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Takeda results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 52.3% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 460 faulty-reasoning hits from 495 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (159 of 24,545 topics). This Takeda is worse (more manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
Takeda
Topic details
Total words: 495
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510099.4% percentile
23.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles495 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 52.3%52.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.9%11.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Topic 52.3%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos