Topic summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video248 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sustainable Building results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 164 hits. Analysis detected 757 faulty-reasoning hits from 992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (2,723 of 23,499 topics). This Sustainable Building is worse (more manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
Sustainable Building
Topic details
Total words: 992
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

88% percentile
025507510088.4% percentile
6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles992 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.6%13.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.5%16.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Bandwagon: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos