Topic summary

⁠52%1 analyzed article/video469 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Sugars In Space results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 205 hits. Analysis detected 1,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,407 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (5,323 of 14,292 topics). This Sugars In Space is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.

Sugars In Space

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠0%	Terms Of Use	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠63%	Sugars In Space (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 1,407

Article count: 1

Authors

Andrew Paul

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Sugars In Space attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Sugars In Space vs sitewide

Sugars In Space attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Sugar discovered floating in deep space for the first time⁠^37%

Popular Science⁠^15%By Andrew Paul⁠^25%7/13/2026, 3:00:00 PM