Topic summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video2,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strategy & Conflict results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, In-Group Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 809 hits. Analysis detected 7,545 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,206 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (9,033 of 14,364 topics). This Strategy & Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Strategy & Conflict
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠0%Terms Of Use1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠38%Strategy & Conflict (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 7,206
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Strategy & Conflict attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Strategy & Conflict vs sitewide
Strategy & Conflict attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos