Topic summary

⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,361 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Sports Economics results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 707 hits. Analysis detected 4,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,790 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (12,285 of 13,018 topics). This Sports Economics is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group.

Sports Economics

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Oakland Culture	1%
⁠0%	Dive Bars	1%
⁠6%	Sports Economics (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 8,790

Article count: 2

Authors

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Sports Economics attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Sports Economics vs sitewide

Sports Economics attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Washington state is spending $120 million on the World Cup. Will it be worth it?⁠^31%

KUOW Public Radio⁠^72%By Anna Boiko-Weyrauch⁠^0%6/12/2026, 4:10:08 PM

Why can FIFA get away with such high World Cup ticket prices?⁠^25%

KCUR - Kansas City news and NPR⁠^55%By Nik DeCosta-Klipa⁠^0%5/25/2026, 9:00:00 AM