Topic summary
48%1 analyzed article/video495 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spent Nuclear Fuel Management results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 1,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (4,662 of 12,121 topics). This Spent Nuclear Fuel Management is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Spent Nuclear Fuel Management
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Spent Nuclear Fuel Management attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Spent Nuclear Fuel Management vs sitewide
Spent Nuclear Fuel Management attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.