Topic summary
18%1 analyzed article/video888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Needs Programs results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and In-Group Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 494 hits. Analysis detected 1,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,552 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 55% (9,636 of 21,294 topics). This Special Needs Programs is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Special Needs Programs
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Special Needs Programs attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Special Needs Programs vs sitewide
Special Needs Programs attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.