Topic summary
18%1 analyzed article/video1,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Special Education Funding results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 343 hits. Analysis detected 1,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,198 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (13,124 of 16,562 topics). This Special Education Funding is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Special Education Funding
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Special Education Funding attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Special Education Funding vs sitewide
Special Education Funding attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.