Author summary
⁠21%1 analyzed article/video1,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julia Merola results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 343 hits. Analysis detected 1,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,198 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (4,770 of 6,630 authors). This Julia Merola is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Julia Merola
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠29%Julia Merola (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,198
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Julia Merola attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Julia Merola vs sitewide
Julia Merola attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos