Topic summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sororities results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 309 hits. Analysis detected 1,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (4,240 of 22,292 topics). This Sororities is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Sororities
Topic details
Total words: 1,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.0% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 26.9%26.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.6%13.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos