Author summary
44% 1 analyzed article/video 287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erica Andrews results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 309 hits . Analysis detected 1,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,221 of 8,712 authors). This Erica Andrews is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Erica Andrews
Author details
Total words: 1,148
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.0% percentile 4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 26.9% 26.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 13.6% 13.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Author 26.9%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 13.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Burden of Proof: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst