Topic summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video977 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Soho results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 512 hits. Analysis detected 2,641 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (10,909 of 23,742 topics). This Soho is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Soho
Topic details
Total words: 3,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510054.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.6%3.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos