Topic summary
⁠27%1 analyzed article/video172 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Signal App results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Optimism Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 95 hits. Analysis detected 356 faulty-reasoning hits from 688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (4,347 of 22,914 topics). This Signal App is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
Signal App
Topic details
Total words: 688
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510081.0% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles688 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.9%3.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 2.5%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos