Topic summary
⁠31%2 analyzed articles/videos1,188 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shelter Animals results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 479 hits. Analysis detected 2,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,752 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (11,154 of 24,573 topics). This Shelter Animals is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Shelter Animals
Topic details
Total words: 4,752
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos