Big dogs need forever homes. Adopt for free in Oakland this weekend 45%

By Oaklandside staff50%

7/31/2026, 12:37:59 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 153 hits. Analysis detected 872 faulty-reasoning hits from 433 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.1% and a BS Rank of 45% (17,809 of 31,901 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the article peer group.

Now is a great time to adopt a big dog. 
Oakland Animal Services, the city’s shelter for dogs, cats, and other animals, announced Friday that it cannot take in any more large dogs because it has exceeded its capacity. 
As a result, OAS is looking to quickly find new homes for many of its plus-sized pups. 
**Oakland Animal Services** 
1101 29th Avenue 
Open Sat. 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. and Sunday 12 p.m. to 3 p.m. 
No appointment needed. 
On Friday, the shelter announced it is waiving all adoption fees for dogs that weigh over 25 pounds on Aug. 1 and 2. 
That means dogs like Tony, a charming 54-pound husky who “enjoys leaning into pets and scritches, often pressing his head against your legs to soak up attention,” or Rosalia, a 57-pound doberman pinscher who “loves going on walks and may happily prance along while sniffing and keeping an eye out for squirrels,” could be yours. 
The ability to waive fees was made possible by a generous donor, OAS officials said. 
“We had a dedicated member of our foster community who loves big dogs call us up and pledge to cover these costs for the weekend,” said OAS Director Joe DeVries. 
“We are so thankful for their support and are looking to get these wonderful animals into loving homes. 
Every large dog who leaves the shelter creates a space for the dogs still coming in.” 
All OAS dogs have been spayed or neutered, have all their vaccinations and microchips, and just need a stable, loving home, and maybe a bit of training. 
One adorable dog that absolutely deserves adoption is Herman. 
According to OAS, Herman came to them in 2025 after his owner was hospitalized and could no longer care for him. 
The shelter was full, so they sent Herman to Miranda’s Rescue in Humboldt County, where they thought he’d be cared for. 
Miranda’s Rescue was raided by sheriff’s deputies in May, and mass graves were exhumed, exposing the remains of dogs allegedly killed for financial gain. 
The rescue’s owner is currently being criminally investigated and sued in civil court over allegations of animal cruelty and fraud. 
Herman survived and returned to Oakland earlier this year, but he still needs to find a new home, according to information on OAS’s website. 
At age 10, Herman, who is 50 pounds, is “a low-drama buddy who’s always up for a walk or a nap on the couch,” according to OAS. 
All of OAS’s adoptable dogs can be viewed on the organization’s website. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 1.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.7%Oaklandside staff: 3.2%Berkeleyside: 2.1%Availability Heuristic12.7%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 1.4%Berkeleyside: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 2.5%Berkeleyside: 2.5%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 5.3%Oaklandside staff: 1.3%Berkeleyside: 0.5%Loss Aversion5.3%This article: 6.2%Oaklandside staff: 1.6%Berkeleyside: 0.4%Status Quo Bias6.2%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.5%Oaklandside staff: 3.3%Berkeleyside: 2.9%Optimism Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.2%Oaklandside staff: 3.9%Berkeleyside: 3.2%Negativity Bias10.2%This article: 4.2%Oaklandside staff: 1.0%Berkeleyside: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 25.2%Oaklandside staff: 16.8%Berkeleyside: 2.6%Halo Effect25.2%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Oaklandside staff: 1.4%Berkeleyside: 0.7%Recency Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.9%Oaklandside staff: 3.5%Berkeleyside: 2.4%Appeal to Authority13.9%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 2.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 35.3%Oaklandside staff: 19.7%Berkeleyside: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion35.3%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.9%Oaklandside staff: 1.0%Berkeleyside: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.9%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 17.6%Oaklandside staff: 4.4%Berkeleyside: 2.4%Anecdotal17.6%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 3.2%Berkeleyside: 0.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.9%Oaklandside staff: 1.7%Berkeleyside: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection6.9%This article: 18.2%Oaklandside staff: 11.1%Berkeleyside: 1.7%Biased Writer Voice18.2%This article: 2.3%Oaklandside staff: 1.4%Berkeleyside: 0.6%Indoctrination2.3%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oaklandside staff: 0.0%Berkeleyside: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 25.4%Oaklandside staff: 6.8%Berkeleyside: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…25.4%

433 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers27%attributed speech317writer words
Selected voice

Joe DeVries

75%flagged-word coverage
64 attributed words55% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Quote-first Misdirection+46.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Joe DeVries: 46.9%46.9%Attempt to Sell a Product -34.7 ptsWriter: 34.7%Joe DeVries: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-24.9 ptsWriter: 24.9%Joe DeVries: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.2 ptsWriter: 3.2%Joe DeVries: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.