Topic summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video1,656 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shared Death Experiences results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Overconfidence Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 471 hits. Analysis detected 3,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (12,219 of 16,562 topics). This Shared Death Experiences is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Shared Death Experiences
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠27%Shared Death Experiences (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,968
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Shared Death Experiences attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Shared Death Experiences vs sitewide
Shared Death Experiences attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos