Topic summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos1,541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Elections results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,980 hits. Analysis detected 12,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,480 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (9,992 of 13,019 topics). This Senate Elections is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Senate Elections
Topic details
Total words: 13,480
Article count: 8
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Senate Elections attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Senate Elections vs sitewide
Senate Elections attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.