Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,585 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Scientific Societies results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 496 hits. Analysis detected 4,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,375 of 16,562 topics). This Scientific Societies is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.

Scientific Societies

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠38%	Scientific Societies (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 6,340

Article count: 1

Authors

Matt Kasson

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Scientific Societies attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Scientific Societies vs sitewide

Scientific Societies attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

The American revolutionaries who popularized science in the early United States⁠^23%

Popular Science⁠^15%By Matt Kasson⁠^0%7/4/2026, 5:00:00 AM