Topic summary
72%4 analyzed articles/videos5,416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Policy results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 2,992 hits. Analysis detected 26,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,804 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (10,175 of 15,620 topics). This Science Policy is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Science Policy
Topic details
Total words: 21,804
Article count: 4
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Science Policy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Science Policy vs sitewide
Science Policy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.