Author summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video1,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Union of Concerned Scientists results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Slippery Slope, and Negativity Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 642 hits. Analysis detected 6,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,654 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (1,095 of 6,222 authors). This Union of Concerned Scientists is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Union of Concerned Scientists
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠83%Union of Concerned Scientists (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,654
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Union of Concerned Scientists attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Union of Concerned Scientists vs sitewide
Union of Concerned Scientists attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos