Topic summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samarium results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 2,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (10,598 of 24,040 topics). This Samarium is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Samarium
Topic details
Total words: 3,780
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos