Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rhetoric In Politics results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Horn Effect, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 484 hits. Analysis detected 3,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (8,216 of 23,713 topics). This Rhetoric In Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Rhetoric In Politics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,700
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 7.9%7.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Horn Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 1.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos