Topic summary
97%1 analyzed article/video287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These R And B Music results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 374 hits. Analysis detected 1,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 87% (3,009 of 22,292 topics). This R And B Music is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
R And B Music
Topic details
Total words: 1,148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510086.5% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 32.6%32.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 24.9%24.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 32.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos