Author summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Moore results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 374 hits . Analysis detected 1,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 91% (858 of 8,618 authors). This Matt Moore is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. Matt Moore
Author details
Total words: 1,148
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.1% percentile 5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 32.6% 32.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 24.9% 24.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.4% 12.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 32.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 24.9%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 7.9%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Composition/Division: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst