Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Queer Rights results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 397 hits. Analysis detected 907 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,792 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 21,936 topics). This Queer Rights is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Queer Rights
Topic details
Total words: 2,792
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.2%14.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos