Topic summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Budgeting results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 691 hits. Analysis detected 6,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,621 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,074 of 14,515 topics). This Public Budgeting is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Public Budgeting
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠0%Terms Of Use1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠79%Public Budgeting (selected)6%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,621
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Public Budgeting attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Public Budgeting vs sitewide
Public Budgeting attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos