Author summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Duran results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 691 hits. Analysis detected 6,833 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,621 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (845 of 5,885 authors). This David Duran is worse (more manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
David Duran
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠86%David Duran (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,621
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Duran attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Duran vs sitewide
David Duran attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos