Topic summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Property Destruction results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 526 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (13,809 of 22,399 topics). This Property Destruction is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Property Destruction
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos