Topic summary
⁠22%1 analyzed article/video511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Pardons results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 871 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (14,875 of 24,545 topics). This Political Pardons is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Political Pardons
Topic details
Total words: 2,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510039.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos