Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Political Forecasting results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Availability Heuristic, and Composition/Division, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 200 hits. Analysis detected 760 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,072 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,912 topics). This Political Forecasting is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Political Forecasting
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Political Forecasting attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Political Forecasting vs sitewide
Political Forecasting attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.