Topic summary

⁠90%1 analyzed article/video1,742 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Political Finance results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 1,913 hits. Analysis detected 10,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (4,883 of 11,708 topics). This Political Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group.

Political Finance

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Survival Stories	1%
⁠0%	Gender Identity	1%
⁠59%	Political Finance (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 6,968

Article count: 1

Authors

Matt Broomfield

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Political Finance attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Political Finance vs All Other Publications

Political Finance attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Why Farage's mates love Montenegro⁠^65%

UnHerd⁠^77%By Matt Broomfield⁠^90%7/13/2026, 11:02:00 PM