Author summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video1,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Broomfield results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 1,913 hits. Analysis detected 10,861 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (1,424 of 4,887 authors). This Matt Broomfield is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Matt Broomfield
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠71%Matt Broomfield (selected)4%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,968
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Matt Broomfield attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Matt Broomfield vs sitewide
Matt Broomfield attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos