Topic summary
⁠1%3 analyzed articles/videos576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pick 4 results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 219 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,304 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (20,544 of 22,295 topics). This Pick 4 is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.
Pick 4
Topic details
Total words: 2,304
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751007.9% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 0.0%0.0%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.5%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.0%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos