Topic summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philanthropic Initiatives results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 293 hits. Analysis detected 1,577 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,740 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (7,231 of 22,425 topics). This Philanthropic Initiatives is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Philanthropic Initiatives
Topic details
Total words: 1,740
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

68% percentile
025507510067.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.8%16.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos