Topic summary
⁠2%1 analyzed article/video543 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philadelphia School District results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 289 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (17,459 of 23,361 topics). This Philadelphia School District is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Philadelphia School District
Topic details
Total words: 2,172
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.1%7.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos