Topic summary
80%1 analyzed article/video725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oregon Wildfires results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Recency Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 290 hits. Analysis detected 1,868 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (6,467 of 21,511 topics). This Oregon Wildfires is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Oregon Wildfires
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Oregon Wildfires attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Oregon Wildfires vs sitewide
Oregon Wildfires attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.