Topic summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oak Park results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 328 hits. Analysis detected 1,480 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (11,988 of 22,443 topics). This Oak Park is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Oak Park
Topic details
Total words: 2,528
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Tu Quoque: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos