Author summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erika Erickson results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 1,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,557 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (1,635 of 6,497 authors). This Erika Erickson is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Erika Erickson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠75%Erika Erickson (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,557
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Erika Erickson attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Erika Erickson vs sitewide
Erika Erickson attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos