Topic summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Strategy results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Slippery Slope, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 292 hits. Analysis detected 2,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (15,935 of 23,503 topics). This Nuclear Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group.
Nuclear Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 3,604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510032.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos