Topic summary
7%2 analyzed articles/videos1,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Propulsion results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 153 hits. Analysis detected 1,163 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,452 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (21,500 of 23,490 topics). This Nuclear Propulsion is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Nuclear Propulsion
Topic details
Total words: 4,452
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

9% percentile
02550751008.5% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate