Topic summary
0%13 analyzed articles/videos8,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Negotiations results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 4,150 hits. Analysis detected 38,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,267 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (12,436 of 13,024 topics). This Nuclear Negotiations is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Nuclear Negotiations
Topic details
Total words: 54,267
Article count: 13
Authors
Showing top 48 attributes by prevalence for chart readability.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Nuclear Negotiations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Nuclear Negotiations vs sitewide
Nuclear Negotiations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.