Topic summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos932 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Diplomacy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 567 hits. Analysis detected 2,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,136 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (16,404 of 21,689 topics). This Nuclear Diplomacy is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Nuclear Diplomacy

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos