Topic summary

⁠19%1 analyzed article/video1,580 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Nuclear Deterrence results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 403 hits. Analysis detected 3,982 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (10,393 of 11,943 topics). This Nuclear Deterrence is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.

Nuclear Deterrence

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Survival Stories	1%
⁠0%	Gender Identity	1%
⁠13%	Nuclear Deterrence (selected)	2%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 6,320

Article count: 1

Authors

Decker Eveleth

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Nuclear Deterrence attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Nuclear Deterrence vs sitewide

Nuclear Deterrence attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Stop Overreacting to China’s Missile Test⁠^22%

Foreign Policy⁠^23%By Decker Eveleth⁠^28%7/13/2026, 4:20:51 PM