Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North Carolina Tar Heels results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 610 hits. Analysis detected 4,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,749 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (7,234 of 13,252 topics). This North Carolina Tar Heels is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
North Carolina Tar Heels
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
North Carolina Tar Heels attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
North Carolina Tar Heels vs sitewide
North Carolina Tar Heels attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.