Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These North Carolina Tar Heels results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 610 hits. Analysis detected 4,053 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,749 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 46% (7,234 of 13,252 topics). This North Carolina Tar Heels is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
North Carolina Tar Heels
Topic details
Total words: 4,749
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
North Carolina Tar Heels attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
North Carolina Tar Heels vs sitewide
North Carolina Tar Heels attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos