Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video3,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neurodiversity And Eating results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 1,301 hits. Analysis detected 6,995 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ā 23% (10,122 of 13,019 topics). This Neurodiversity And Eating is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Neurodiversity And Eating attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Neurodiversity And Eating vs sitewide
Neurodiversity And Eating attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.