Topic summary
⁠7%1 analyzed article/video774 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neighborhood Evolution results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 207 hits. Analysis detected 876 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (21,094 of 24,545 topics). This Neighborhood Evolution is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
Neighborhood Evolution
Topic details
Total words: 3,096
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510014.1% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%No True Scotsman: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos